Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Anagnostakis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1964No. 10081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice:

Plaintiff, respondent here, Mrs. Vickie J. Pierce, brought this action to recover from George Anagnostakis, doing business as The Shah, defendant and appellant, and Shah, Inc. to recover minimum wages and the value of meals not furnished to her as a waitress in The Shah nightclub in Salt Lake City. Vickie worked from December 31, 1960, to June 17, 1961, without receiving any pay except tips. The case was submitted to the jury on interrogatories, and from the jury’s answers the court entered judgment against Anagnostakis for $782.90, together with prior accumulated interest of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Rozell v. VansyckleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Short v. Bullion-Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Twiehaus v. RosnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Young v. WierengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Robinson's Medical Mart, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Faust v. KAI Technologies, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Faust v. KAI Technologies, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API