Legal Opinion

Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1970No. 209-67PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NICHOLS, Judge.

This ease is before us on cross motions for summary judgment.. The plaintiff, a non-veteran career employee, sues for back pay lost as a result of his removal by adverse action from the post of Revenue Agent, GS-11, in the Inter*1253nal Revenue Service. He has exhausted his administrative remedies. In this court he tells us that the removal was legally invalid for a number of asserted errors of procedure and in the receipt of evidence. We hold that he is clearly right on the failure to accord him the opportunity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tierney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Washington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  3. Washington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Robert D. Paterson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Joseph F. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Andrew Connor v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Francis Muscare v. Robert J. Quinn, Individually and as Commissioner, Chicago Fire Dept.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API