Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NICHOLS, Judge.
This ease is before us on cross motions for summary judgment.. The plaintiff, a non-veteran career employee, sues for back pay lost as a result of his removal by adverse action from the post of Revenue Agent, GS-11, in the Inter*1253nal Revenue Service. He has exhausted his administrative remedies. In this court he tells us that the removal was legally invalid for a number of asserted errors of procedure and in the receipt of evidence. We hold that he is clearly right on the failure to accord him the opportunity…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tierney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Washington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Washington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Robert D. Paterson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Joseph F. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
3Cited by25 opinions
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Andrew Connor v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Francis Muscare v. Robert J. Quinn, Individually and as Commissioner, Chicago Fire Dept.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.