Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Joseph F. O'Brien v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1960No. 146-58PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURFEE, Judge.

The plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible, sues for the salary of an attorney in the Department of Justice from the date of his removal for the efficiency of the service, January 8, 1954. He claims that his removal was procedurally defective in that he was not afforded all of his statutory rights under section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, as amended. 1 On September 4, 1953, he received a notice of proposed removal from Assistant Attorney General Burger setting forth four charges. During the ensuing month he replied to the charges by letter and several written…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Washington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  2. Armand v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Washington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Julia E. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Tierney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Chappelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Robert D. Paterson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API