Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Jackson v. Dallman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1994No. 94-528PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
Jackson essentially argues in his propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in denying him habeas corpus relief. The court of appeals determined that Jackson was not entitled to release from prison because:
“The evidence submitted to this court demonstrates petitioner in fact signed a written jury waiver. Although respondent has been unable to produce the actual written waiver petitioner signed, we are confident the trial court complied with R.C. 2945.05. * * * ”
R.C. 2945.05 provides:
“In all criminal cases pending in the courts of record in this state, the defendant may waive a trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Lima v. RamboOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
3Cited by39 opinions
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. FishOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State ex rel. Larkins v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.