City of Lima v. Rambo
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.
Notwithstanding that counsel for defendant, appellant herein, have, in their brief, argued certain claims of prejudicial error, which arguments and claims we have con sidered and find without merit, this court, in its examination of the record, has observed a possible error neither specifically claimed nor argued by counsel for defendant, which in the interests of justice, and as permitted by statute, should be considered and decided.
The appeal herein is from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Allen County affirming a judgment of conviction and sentence of the Municipal Court of Lima,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. FifeOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Winters v. Alvis, WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Jackson v. DallmanOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Whirley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- State v. CheadleOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.