Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Larkins v. Baker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 95-278PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We determine today that a writ of habeas corpus will not lie where a criminal defendant has waived his right to a jury trial by executing a written waiver, where the waiver is handed to the trial judge and placed in the court’s case file, but is not file stamped. A writ of habeas corpus will lie in certain extraordinary circumstances where there is an unlawful restraint of a person’s liberty and there is no adequate legal remedy. State ex rel. Pirman v. Money (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 591, 593, 635 N.E.2d 26, 29. A most common situation in which habeas corpus relief is available is when the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. DallmanOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. SwigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. City of Zanesville v. RouseOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API