Legal Opinion
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1999No. A079430PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
This is a valuation case, coming by way of a complaint for order of general reference of dispute. The dispute concerns the amount of rent payable to plaintiff railroad by defendant pipeline company 1 for a series of noncontiguous pipeline easements spanning approximately 1,863 miles and running beneath the railroad’s right-of-way.
By stipulation the parties charged the referee with determining “the amount of the rent increase payable, if any, in accordance with the ‘fair market value of the easement[s]’ as of January 1, 1994.”
The parties prepared for the reference proceeding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Kelly v. New West Federal SavingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CO. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Gordon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.