Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 9, 1995No. B091774PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) has long-term contracts to purchase electricity generated by wind-powered turbines owned by Energy Development and Construction Corporation and San Gorgonio Farms, Inc. (referred to collectively as Energy Development). Each contract is divided into two “periods.” During the 10-year “first period,” Edison is required to pay a substantially higher price for the electricity than during the “second period.” A dispute exists between the parties as to when the “first period” commences to run. The trial court agreed with Energy Development’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Consolidated World Investments, Inc. v. Lido Preferred Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Heston v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
- Wolsey, Ltd. v. Foodmaker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.