Legal Opinion
Rasmussen v. Glass
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1993No. CX-92-1792PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.
By writ of certiorari, relators contend a three-member panel of the Minneapolis Commission on Human Rights (Commission) erred by concluding they discriminated against respondents on the basis of creed. Relators argue the Commission erred by (a) defining the term “creed” to include more than religious beliefs and (b) infringing upon their rights of conscience under the Minnesota Constitution. We reverse.
FACTS
At the time of the events which gave rise to this action, relator Tim Glass owned, managed and conducted business as The Beach Club Deli (Beach Club). The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Augustine v. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- LaBere v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Hilaire v. Minco Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- In Re RothenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Rasmussen v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993