Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Rothenberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 2004No. A03-884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., J.

Petitioner Elliot Rothenberg is a lawyer currently licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota. During his most recent three-year reporting period for continuing legal education credits, Rothenberg chose not to comply with Rule 9(A)(2) of the Rules of the Minnesota Board of Continuing Legal Education (RMBCLE). Rule 9(A)(2) requires lawyers to submit an affidavit showing that they have completed at least two hours of courses on the elimination of bias in the legal profession and in the practice of law. At a hearing before the Board of Continuing Legal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edina Community Lutheran Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Daywitt v. MoserDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API