State v. Vargas
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
1. In these consolidated cases we review Defendants’ contentions that the trial court erred in upholding the exigent circumstances exception to the knoek-and-announce rule, and in denying their motions to suppress controlled substances seized by law enforcement officers incident to their execution of arrest warrants upon Defendants at their residence. Because our review of the record indicates the existence of evidence from which the trial court could properly determine that exigent circumstances justified the officers’ decision to dispense with the knock- and-announce…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John LalorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Emmett Lovell NaborsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SteinzigNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. PonceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.