Legal Opinion

State v. Steinzig

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1999No. 19,210PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

{1} The State appeals from an order suppressing evidence seized by law enforcement officers pursuant to a search warrant issued by a district court judge. Two issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether the affidavit for search warrant provided sufficient information for the issuing judge to satisfy the veracity requirement of the informants named in the affidavit; and (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling that the drugs and drug paraphernalia seized during the search of Defendant’s residence were not subject to the plain view exception. Reversed and remanded.

FACTS

{2}…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. CordovaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. EckelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API