Legal Opinion
State v. Christopher S.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 10, 2021No. SC20247PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHRISTOPHER S.* (SC 20247) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Vertefeuille, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 54-1o (b)), a ‘‘written . . . statement of a person under investigation for or accused of’’ certain crimes ‘‘made as a result of a custodial interrogation at a place of detention shall be presumed to be inadmissible as evidence against the person in any criminal pro- ceeding unless . . . [a]n electronic recording is made of the custodial interrogation . . . .’’ Pursuant further to statute (§ 54-1o (h)), the presumption of inadmissibility under §…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
- State v. BemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.