Moore v. Hubbard
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.
The appellee sued appellant upon a note, or contract, for the payment of money, executed to Carlin & Lennox, and assigned to appellee by endorsement.
The complaint is attacked, for the first time, in this court. The language of the instrument is peculiar, and we find some difficulty in intelligently interpreting all its parts. It is clear to our minds, however, that *85the complaint contains sufficient to enable it to with? stand the assault made upon it in this court. There is an absolute and unconditional promise to pay a. fixed amount at specified times. The language of the latter portion of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Waterman v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Rodenbarger v. BramblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Judson v. RomaineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LyonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Utah National Bank of Salt Lake City v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Fisher v. LehrerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Baxter v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Webb v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.