Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Droz

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2007No. 48331PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter concerns our automatic review under SCR 105(3) of a Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board hearing panel’s recommendation for professional discipline. The panel recommended that disbarred Utah attorney Paul Droz, who has never been licensed in Nevada, be enjoined from practicing law in Nevada or appearing in any Nevada court, that he be fined $3,000 and assessed the disciplinary proceeding’s costs, and that the state bar be directed to refer this matter to appropriate law enforcement authorities for possible criminal investigation and to report the matter to the Utah and…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of DrakulichNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re Discipline of StuhffNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. ShaneKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In the Matter Of: David M. BagdadeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Virgin Islands Bar v. BruschSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
  3. In Re: Discipline Of Brian Moquin, Esq.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. In Re: Discipline Of Christopher G. BeckomNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In Re: Discipline Of Mark T. GallagherNevada Supreme Court · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API