Legal Opinion
Dombrowski v. Jennings & Griffin Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 28, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
In the defendants’ brief they state that the claimed corrections in the finding are not essential to support their reasons of appeal. There is no occasion, therefore, to consider them.
The commissioner finds that pneumoconiosis was first discovered in the plaintiff in October, 1923, and that it probably had been in existence for a considerable time before that date, and that, as a result of tho pneumoconiosis, the resistance of the plaintiff to infection was lowered, and as a result of the lowered resistance a pulmonary tuberculosis developed at some time between October, 1923, and April,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Victor Chemical Works v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- De La Pena v. Jackson Stone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Green v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Claim of Edwardsen v. Jarvis Lighterage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Rousu v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Cashman v. McTernan School, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.