Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Hock Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Company (Marcus & Millichap or Broker) appeals from a trial court order denying its petition to compel arbitration. We conclude the trial court correctly found there was no agreement to arbitrate the dispute at issue. Consequently, we affirm.
I
Facts
This case arises from a real estate transaction in which Hock Investment Company and Bryan Silverstein (buyers) purchased a 79-unit apartment complex from Country Club Partners (sellers). Marcus & Millichap represented both the sellers and the buyers in the transaction.
After the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kinney v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Westra v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Basura v. U.S. Home Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Gorlach v. Sports Club Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.