Legal Opinion
Luftman v. Ross
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 12, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
This is an application by plaintiffs for a temporary injunction.
The action is brought by twelve tenants of unfurnished apartments in the Hotel Marcy, New York, and “on behalf of all other tenants of unfurnished apartments of the Hotel Marcy” similarly situated. Defendant, Bing & Bing, Inc., appears to be the landlord. Defendant, New York City Temporary Housing Rent Commission, is alleged to be an agency created by the City of New York.
The relief demanded is an injunction restraining the Commission from considering or granting an application of the landlord for an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Porter v. DickenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hock v. 250 Northern Ave. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In re SeitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945
- Land v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCrae v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
- Giesecke v. Denver Tramway CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Miller v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Stuart v. CreelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Fox v. 34 Hillside Realty CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.