Legal Opinion

Fox v. 34 Hillside Realty Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge.

This action is brought by tenants of an apartment house located at 34 Hillside Avenue, New York City, of which, defendant is landlord.

It appears that on April 26, 1948, the Housing Expediter upon application of defendant allowed it a per cent over-all increase on the monthly rental payable by each of the plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs ask for an injunction restraining defendant from collecting the increase granted or seeking any further increase in rents in excess of the maximum rents in effect on June 30, 1947, and demand a money judgment for damages pursuant to Section 20S of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hock v. 250 Northern Ave. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Luftman v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Heitmuller v. BerkowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  5. Neustein v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Potrero Hill Community Action Committee, Etc. v. The Housing Authority of the City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. McCrae v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
  3. Miller v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Ambassade Realty Corp. v. WinklerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
  5. Michaels v. Macan Estates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API