Legal Opinion
Miller v. Woods
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 6, 1950No. 10764PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Certain tenants sued the Blousing Expediter to enjoin him from terminating federal rent control in Los Angeles, which he threatened to do because he had received a resolution of the Council of that City that there no longer existed therein such a shortage in rental housing accommodations as to require rent control. The City of Los Angeles was permitted to intervene and moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the sub*500ject matter and .for failure to state a claim upon which relief could .be granted. We are asked to review the action of the district court in granting the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knowles v. War Damage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Luftman v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Fox v. 34 Hillside Realty CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Spieler v. HaasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3Cited by12 opinions
- Potrero Hill Community Action Committee, Etc. v. The Housing Authority of the City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Charlie Ervin Waller v. Professional Insurance Corporation, J. R. Reinhardt and J. Edwin LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Al Friedman v. International Association of MacHinistsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Riley v. TitusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Sheherazade, Inc. v. MardikianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.