Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Creel

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 18, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R.'KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The Court has before it a motion by the plaintiffs to remand this action to the City Court of the City of New York from which it was removed on the filing of the defendant’s -petition. The action was removed to this court pursuant .to Section 1441(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A., which permits a civil action brought in a state court to be removed by the defendant, if the district court has original jurisdiction in the matter. Section 1447(e) of Title 28 U.S.C.A. provides that the district court shall remand a case if at any time before final judgment it appears that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Colorado Life Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Haney v. WilcheckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1941
  4. United Artists Corp. v. Ancore Amusement Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  5. Harley v. Firemen's Fund Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lange v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1982
  2. Barnes v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  3. Ingram v. SterlingDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  4. Milton R. Barrie Co., Inc. v. LevineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  5. Corcoran v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API