Legal Opinion

Jose Emilio E.-M. v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 8, 2026No. 1:25-cv-02054Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSE EMILIO E.-M.,1 Case No. 1:25-cv-02054-EGC (HC) 10 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR Petitioner, 11 ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO v. EAJA AND DENYING RESPONDENTS’ 12 REQUEST TO HOLD IN ABEYANCE 13 (Docs. 15, 19) CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., 14 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Respondents. 15 16 Petitioner Jose Emilio E.M. (“Petitioner”), formerly a federal detainee proceeding by 17 counsel, initiated this action with the filing of a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1).…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Department of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API