State v. Karpenter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The title of the Act of 1915 begins with this clause: "Relating to Intoxicating Liquors." This is broad enough to cover the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The Act of 1917 is amendatory of the other act. The contention that the title does not embrace the subject of unlawful possession is ruled to the contrary by the opinion of Mr. Justice RAND inMcLaughlin v. Helgerson, 116 Or. 310, 314 et seq. (241 P. 50), and cases therein cited. Although…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Chrudinsky v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- McLaughlin v. HelgersonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. KarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Hooton v. Jarman Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.