State v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant was convicted by jury trial of the crime of assault and robbery while armed, namely, with two pistols. ORS 163.280. He makes numerous assignments of error on appeal: That the “lineup” was illegally conducted; that testimony identifying the weapons was improper; that the court should not have stricken the phrase “not having a license or permit to carry said pistol” from the indictment; that defendant should have been permitted to testify as to his previous conviction on direct examination; that certain physical evidence of the alleged crime should not have been received; and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. Lem WoonOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. CarceranoOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977