Hauser v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentStraup, J.
As I understand the prevailing opinion, a rule is announced that there is a distinction as to our power and duty in reviewing so-called “affirmative” and “negative” findings of the commission. In such particular it in effect is stated that “affirmative” findings of the commission on evidence in conflict will not be reviewed, except to ascertain whether the findings are or are not supported by sufficient competent evidence; but that so-called “negative” findings will not be disturbed, unless it is made to appear that the commission arbitrarily or capriciously disregarded undisputed or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MoteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.