Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1986No. 852SC815PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Defendant was charged in a proper bill of indictment with food stamp fraud in violation of G.S. 108A-53(a). She signed a written “Waiver of Right to Assigned Counsel” and pled not guilty to the offense. At trial, both the State and defendant presented evidence. A jury found defendant guilty as charged and she was sentenced to the presumptive term of three years for a Class H felony. Defendant appealed.

While represented by counsel on appeal, defendant makes no assignment of error or argument. Rather, defendant’s counsel notes that he has “carefully examined the court file and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. KinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. MemsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. HyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. SorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API