Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 2004No. COA03-593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

Defendant was charged with conspiracy to sell cocaine, sale of cocaine, delivery of cocaine, and possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine. Prior to trial, defendant sent his appointed counsel a letter asking that new counsel be appointed in his case. On 23 May 2002, a hearing was held before Judge Richard D. Boner on defendant’s request. Defendant and the trial court then engaged in the following colloquy:

The State: Your Honor, this is the defendant’s motion to consider counsel.

The Court: He doesn’t have a lawyer?

[Defense Counsel]: I’m his appointed attorney right…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. McGuireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WatlingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. AretzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API