Legal Opinion

Strausberg v. Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLC

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2013No. Docket 33,331PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case we address which party has the burden to prove that a contract is unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable. PlaintiffNina Strausberg signed an arbitration agreement as a mandatory condition of her admission to the Arbor Brook Healthcare nursing home. Despite having signed the arbitration agreement, Plaintiff subsequently sued Arbor Brook and several other defendants for alleged negligent care. Defendants moved the district court to compel arbitration and to dismiss Plaintiffs case. In response, Plaintiff argued that the arbitration…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Peavy v. Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Laurich v. Red Lobster Rests., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. La Frontera Center, Inc. v. United Behavioral Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  4. Dalton v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Velasquez v. Regents of Northern N.M. Coll.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API