Legal Opinion

Sisk v. Transylvania Community Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 2010No. 67PA09PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

In this case we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion when it revoked the pro hac vice status of two out-of-state attorneys pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 84-4.2. Recognizing the inherent power of the courts to control trials and discipline attorneys, as well as the important public interest in regulating out-of-state attorneys who practice law in this state, we hold that the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct do not limit the trial court’s discretion to revoke pro hac vice status. Because we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Travco Hotels, Inc. v. PIEDMONT NAT. GAS CO., INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Smith v. Beaufort County Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. City of Asheville v. AlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Holloway v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. In re ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Reeder v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API