Legal Opinion

Forest Hills Utility Co. v. City of Heath

Licking County Court of Common Pleas

Decided October 23, 1973No. 58133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

There was submitted for decision by this court a paper captioned “Request for Instructions by Notary.” Discovery proceedings had been initiated under Rule 26 and Rule 30 of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.

The intervenor in this case is described as Forest Hills Lot Owners Association, aka the Forest Hills Citizens Committee, and on August 3, 1973, it filed in this court a second amended cross-complaint, as a class action, against the named plaintiff, Forest Hills Utility Company, and defendants David R. Pheils, Jr., et al. The cross-complaint asked that a constructive trust be declared in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Jamison v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grand Forks Herald v. District Court Ex Rel. Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. ZulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Insulation Unlimited, Inc. v. Two J's Properties, Ltd.Miami County Court of Common Pleas · 1997
  4. Grand Forks Herald v. District Court Ex Rel. Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. ZulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API