Langley v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This ease was tried by the court without a jury. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence defendant moved for a nonsuit and when said motion was denied, declined to offer any evidence. Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendant has appealed.
The facts which are not disputed are, in substance, that on May 17, 1924, one W. T. Holland was the owner of a Willys-Knight roadster automobile and on that date appellant insured said W. T. Holland for a period of one year from that date in an amount not exceeding $5,000 against damages arising from death…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Peabody v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Allison v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nationwide Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Pinon v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Pousson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.