Legal Opinion

State v. City National Bank of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1979No. 1238PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Justice.

City National Bank of Austin (bank), ap-pellee, brought suit against the State of Texas (State), the State Commission for the Blind (Commission), the Executive Director of the Commission and its individual members, to recover rent alleged to be due the bank for office space occupied by the Commission. The State answered by alleging that no valid contract existed during the period sued for, and, therefore, no sum of money can be paid under the Constitution of Texas; moreover, the State alleged, the Board of Control (Board) had refused to approve any voucher for rent until it had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Austin Nat. Bank v. SheppardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  2. Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. State ex rel AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wortham v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fort Worth Cavalry Club, Inc. v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Austin National Bank v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goerlitz v. City of Midland, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  2. Avmanco, Inc. v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Wickersham Ford, Inc. v. Orange CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. State v. City National Bank of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Palacios Seafood, Inc. v. Piling, Inc., and Matagorda County Navigation District Number OneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API