Kister v. City of Hastings
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stauffer, District Judge.
This is an action to enjoin the collection of special assessments levied to pay the cost of paving improvement in paving district No. 93, city of Hastings, Nebraska. Twenty-six property owners within the paving district are named as plaintiffs. The city of Hastings, the mayor, councilmen, city clerk, city treasurer, county clerk, and the county treasurer of Adams county, Nebraska, are parties defendant. The district court dismissed the action. Plaintiffs appeal.
The plaintiffs and others petitioned the mayor and council to create a paving district. The district was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Joliet v. HarwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Kerker v. BocherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- City of Bartlesville v. HolmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Shaver v. J. W. Turner Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cullingham v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Wookey v. City of AlmaNebraska Supreme Court · 1929