Legal Opinion

Mardian v. Wayne Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Mandamus by Rudolph Mardian to compel Sherman B. Daboll, acting circuit judge of Wayne county, to vacate an order appointing a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the vacation of an order appointing a receiver. It has been repeatedly held that orders appointing receivers, whereby the possession of property is divested, are appealable. See Barry v. Briggs, 22 Mich. 201; People v. Jones, 33 Mich. 303; Taylor v. Sweet, 40 Mich. 736; Morey v. Grant, 48 Mich. 330; Perrin v. Lepper, 56 Mich. 351.

It is a well-settled rule that mandamus will not lie when there is another adequate remedy. The following Michigan authorities will be found to sustain this rule: People v. Jackson Circuit Judges, 1 Doug. 302; People v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barry v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People ex rel. Port Huron & Gratiot Railway Co. v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. People ex rel. Wiley v. Judge of Allegan CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Taylor v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Eyke v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hartz v. JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Reed v. St. Clair Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hopper v. Livingston Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Freud v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API