Taylor v. Sweet
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Mason. Bill for settlement of partnership affairs. Defendant appeals from an order directing the receiver appointed to conduct the business, to pay over certain sums to the. parties on application at stated times.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The bill in this case is filed for the pur*738pose of settling up the affairs of a copartnership between the parties, which was entered into April 5, 1873, for the manufacture and sale of lumber. Among the provisions of the copartnership articles was one that complainant was to have the supervision and control of the mill, but that lie was to make no charge to the copartnership for his services, and that Cassius H. Sweet, a son of defendant, was to devote his time and attention to the business also without charge. The business was continued under the articles until May 20, 1878, when complainant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barry v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Lewis v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- People ex rel. Port Huron & Gratiot Railway Co. v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by17 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State Central Savings Bank v. Fanning Ball-Bearing Chain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Furniture Manufacturers Ass'n of Grand Rapids v. Grand Rapids Guild of ExhibitorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Westgate v. WestgateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Mardian v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.