Hartz v. Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by John C. Hartz against James O. Murfin, one of the circuit judges of Wayne county, to vacate an order dismissing an appeal from proceedings of the township board of Plymouth to establish a highway, to reinstate said appeal, and to proceed to consider it.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this case petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus to compel the circuit judge to vacate and set aside an order dismissing an appeal from the township board of the township of Plymouth, in a certain highway proceeding, and to reinstate said appeal in the circuit court.
It appears that upon the petition of the requisite number of freeholders of said township, the commissioner of highways took certain action to lay out a highway therein,- through lands belonging to the petitioner. The petitioner conceiving himself aggrieved by the determination of such commissioner, perfected an appeal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Jackson v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Holbrook v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Michigan Mutual Fire Insurance v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pérez Segovia v. Tribunal de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- Erlandson v. Genesee County Employees' Retirement CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Detroit v. General Foods Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lilienthal v. City of WyandotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Morgan v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.