Eyke v. Lange
Michigan Supreme Court
Rehearing, by order of the court, of mandamus case reported in 90 Mich. 592. The facts are stated in the several opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
’ The facts in this proceeding appear in the former decision of this Court, reported in 90 Mich. 592. *27The subject-matter was again before the Court, in another form, in City of Muskegon v. Lange, ante, 19. The earlier case is now here upon rehearing, and the question before us is whether mandamus should issue to compel the cashier of a national bank to pay taxes assessed against a stockholder upon his stock of said bank.
This tax appears to have been assessed under the law of 1889. (See 90 Mich. 592.) Section 33 makes it the duty of the cashier to pay such tax, and this has been held tornean…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People ex rel. Brower & Delaney v. Judge of Wayne Co. CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
- Town of St. Albans v. National Car Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1884
- Eyke v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Emory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Barney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Bank of Detroit v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Brewer v. Folsom Bros. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Croskery v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Manufacturers National Bank v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Mardian v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.