Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Dunn

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Monroe County. Action by Mattie B. Kendall against L. B. Dunn. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

Plaintiff, forty-two years old and no doubt comely, sued defendant, seventy-six years old and well-to-do, for forty thousand dollars damages because he did not keep his promise to marry her. She recovered, through the verdict of a jury, a judgment against him for $2,408.33. A reversal and new trial are sought.

The verdict is by no means contrary to the evidence. The promise is admitted by defendant in his testimony; the breach is proved by the testimony of plaintiff and by facts and circumstances which corroborate her testimony in that regard. The jury were fully warranted in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daniel v. SorrellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. Bennett v. BeamMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Dent v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Goddard v. WestcottMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kurtz v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stacey v. DolanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Holmes v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Thorn v. TetrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wolcott v. Mayor of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API