Legal Opinion

Tuthill v. Stoehr

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by Garner G. Talboy and Erik Bjorkman, two of the five defendants, from a decree of the circuit court which grants judgment upon a promissory note payable to the plaintiff, and foreclose a real estate mortgage delivered to him as mortgagee to secure payment of the note. Both instruments were signed by the defendant Emily S. Stoehr. The decree grants judgment against her, Bjork-man, and T. E. and Clara A. Hammersly, all of them being defendants. It found that Bjorkman and the Hammerslys had assumed payment of the mortgage debt. The fifth defendant, Talboy, was a grantee in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hurst v. MerrifieldOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Title & Trust Co. v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gleason v. DensonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Force v. HeusnerOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ruff v. BoltzOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sorenson v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Security State Bank v. LuebkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Capps v. Georgia Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API