Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Luebke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 1986No. 32796; CA A36325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant Rathbone appeals from a trial court judgment foreclosing his interest in real property. He contends that the Statute of Limitations, ORS 88.110, barred plaintiff s foreclosure action. We reverse and remand.1

On July 15, 1970, defendant Luebke executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note in the amount of $46,560.81, secured by a mortgage on the real property that is the subject of this action. The maturity date of the note and the mortgage was July 15, 1971. The note and mortgage were recorded on May 7, 1971. When the note was not paid on time, the parties renegotiated its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API