Legal Opinion

Ruff v. Boltz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This was an action for a real estate commission which was tried by the court without a jury. Plaintiff appealed from a judgment for defendant.

There were sharp conflicts in the testimony. Because judgment was rendered for defendant we shall state the disputed evidence in a manner most favorable to her. Defendant gave Hillsdale Realty (Hills-dale) an exclusive listing to sell a residence. After the listing expired she verbally requested Hillsdale to continue to make efforts to sell the property. On August 21, 1965, while working as a saleslady for Hillsdale, Diane Blackwood called defendant at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gleason v. DensonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kight v. Orchard-HaysOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Tuthill v. StoehrOregon Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Deering v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wall v. SEC Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API