Legal Opinion

State v. Settle

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1990No. 87-435PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

This is a welfare fraud case based on alleged violations of RSA 167:17-b, 1(a) (Supp. 1989), which provides that

“[n]o person shall ... [b]y means of an intentionally false statement or misrepresentation or by impersonation or other fraudulent act or device obtain or attempt to obtain, or aid or abet any person in obtaining any assistance or benefit or payment under RSA 161 or RSA 167 to which he is not entitled____”

The defendant was convicted by a jury in Superior Court (Cann, J.) upon four indictments under the statute and appeals his conviction to this court upon three grounds: (1) trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. InselburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. State v. LavalleeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. MartiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. HannonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. State v. SoricelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API