Legal Opinion

Cal-Am Corp. v. Department of Real Estate

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1980No. Civ. 56545PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus. It concerns the jurisdictional authority of the Department of Real Estate (hereinafter Department) to regulate, in the State of California, the sale of time-share interests in resort condominiums. In order to be subject to Department regulations requiring permits and public reports, the sale by appellant of membership interests in the Royal Hawaiian Adventure Club must constitute the sale or lease of lots or parcels in a subdivision. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 10249.1, 11000, 11004.5.)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Von Goerlitz v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Estate of PittsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. STATE, ETC. v. Carriage House AssociatesNevada Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Tiffany v. Sturbridge Camping Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Kalins v. Commonwealth, State Real Estate CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Bernhardt v. HemphillColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. City of West Hollywood v. 1112 Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API