Legal Opinion

Estate of Pitts

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14383PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal from an order confirming a sale of property by the executrix of the last will and testament of Mae Pur die Pitts, and is prosecuted by Rosina M. D. Janssen, as creditor of the estate, which estate is insolvent. In order that we may understand the question involved we shall proceed at this point to set down the facts which give rise to the controversy. Hnion Terrace is a nonprofit, co-operative corporation, organized for the purpose of creating and maintaining an apartment house in which each member of the corporation holds, under an agreement to be described later, an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mahoney v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. California Coastal Commission v. Quanta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. In re LacailleNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. McKenney v. McNearneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API