Harris v. Puget Sound Electric Railway
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 25, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, and a stipulation, in an action to recover for expenses and loss of services of a minor child.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought by the respondent to recover certain expenses, and for loss of earning capacity of her minor son during infancy, by reason of personal injuries received by her son in a collision, as stated in Harris v. Puget Sound Elec. R., ante p. 289, 100 Pac. 838, and Id. ante p. 298, 100 Pac. 841. This case was tried to the court without a jury and was based upon the same state of facts as shown in the other two cases. It was stipulated that, in the event the court should find in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, the amount of recovery should be fixed in the sum of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hedrick v. Ilwaco Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
- Daly v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Harris v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Donald v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Harris v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burns v. EmingerMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Gigante v. ÁlvaresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
- Flessher v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Lofgren v. Western Washington Corp. of Seventh Day AdventistsWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Gigante v. ÁlvarezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.