Legal Opinion

Flessher v. Carstens Packing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1917No. 13821PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, French, J., entered January 24, 1916, upon the pleadings, dismissing an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— The purpose of this action was to recover damages alleged to have accrued to the plaintiff because of the injury which his minor daughter had sustained through the negligence of the defendant. The issues were made up by the complaint, the amended answer (which will be referred to as the answer) and the reply. When the cause came on to be heard upon the merits, and after a jury had been impaneled and sworn, the defendant moved the court for a judgment upon the pleadings, which motion was sustained, and a judgment entered which operated as a dismissal of the action. From this judgment, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daly v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Murphy v. SummersettWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Donald v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Harris v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hammer v. CaineWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Berschauer Phillips Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Large v. ShivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Gigante v. ÁlvaresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
  4. Flessher v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Berschauer Philips Construction Co. v. Mutual Of Enumclaw Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API