Legal Opinion

Harris v. Puget Sound Electric Railway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1909No. 7473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 25, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action by an employee for injuries sustained in a railway collision.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries received by Otto Harris, in the same collision in which his father was killed, as stated in Harris v. Puget Sound Elec. R., ante p. 289, 100 Pac. 838. The case was tried to the court and a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of respondent for $2,000. The defendant appeals.

The same points are presented in this case as were presented in that case. The decision in that case controls this. The further point is made in this case, however, that there *299is no evidence to show that the father was authorized to employ his son under an agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bradburn v. Whatcom County Railway & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gigante v. ÁlvaresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
  2. Harris v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Otey v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Gigante v. ÁlvarezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API