Legal Opinion

Darr v. Long

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1981No. 43524PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

This is an appeal from the entry of a decree in garnishment by the District Court for Douglas County in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company in the amount of $40,000. This decree was based upon a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs in an action against C. Caroll Long, doing business as Caroll Long Auto Sales. The “funds” garnished were the face value of two $20,000 motor vehicle dealer’s bonds issued by Aetna to C. Caroll Long in accordance with the statutory requirement that all applicants for motor vehicle dealer licenses furnish a surety bond to insure…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fico, Inc. v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Kantorczyk v. New Stanton Auto Auction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. Jerry M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. First Data Corp. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Strong v. Omaha Construction Industry Pension PlanNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United Pacific Ins. Co. v. BerryhillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API