Legal Opinion

George v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1992No. 260A91PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The question presented in this case is when does the statute of limitations begin to run in favor of a corporate surety which has filed a bond discharging a lien under N.C.G.S. § 44A-16(6). We agree with the Court of Appeals that the statute of limitations begins to run when final judgment is entered in favor of the lien claimant; however, we reach this result by a different path than the one taken by the Court of Appeals. We therefore modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I

Following are the facts necessary for an understanding of the single issue involved in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. George v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Gelder & Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Irving Place Associates v. 628 Park Ave, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State Ex Rel. State Art Museum Building Commission v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Irving Place v. 628 Park AveUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Dw Flowe & Son, Inc. v. CDC, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters), 2021 Ncbc 27aNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API