National Cash Register Co. v. Dehn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Collins, J. Assumpsit by the National Cash Register Company against August Dehn and Carl O. Dehn, copartners as Dehn Bros., for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
This case was before this court on a prior occasion. See 139 Mich. 406. A sufficient statement of the facts therein appears. The judgment upon the former trial was there reversed for errors pointed out. Blair, J., speaking for the court, says in conclusion:
“We think that the only question which should have been submitted to the jury was whether the machines delivered were of the same description as the ones actually ordered, and the jury should have been instructed to find a verdict for the plaintiff in case they found that the cash registers delivered were the same kind of registers as those…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Krause v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- National Cash Register Co. v. DehnMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Ripley v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Ripley v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- King v. Edward Thompson Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914